Some might argue that to get rid of that component of the registry, as opposed to tightening it up.... That might be another way of approaching it, in terms of policy--tracking the guns, if you will. I know that's an issue you're looking at.
I want to wrap up, and I'll go back to my point that my understanding is that in terms of administration--I know all the other things you were talking about when you were talking about $80 million--the actual administration of the registry, we were talking $25 million very specifically. That actually had come down.
My colleague was very specific with the previous government about having a cap, because of all the concerns that had been brought forward, and that the cap be $25 million. I'm a little puzzled, as we're hearing that it would be a savings of about $2 million if we have the changes to the long gun registry. I think we really need to have clarification on that, because we're hearing that billions of dollars are being spent, etc., and it might mislead people in understanding what the actual savings would be, and then of course there are the effects of those changes that I've already mentioned.