The next issue for me, in looking at this, is that we had three separate bodies with different pieces of intelligence that chose to share that intelligence in different ways, both with the government and with other agencies. In the example of the RCMP, they seem to have shared certain information with the government, certain information with CSIS, certain information with foreign governments, such as that of the United States—the information they got from CSIS or from the government.
How do we reconcile this? Obviously we have a real problem here. You have three different bodies with different points of view on the intelligence that's before them and different ways of using that intelligence. Do you think it speaks for the need to have one vehicle through which intelligence is collected and vetted?
Secondly, what about rules around information that comes from states that are known to practice torture, and the fact that the RCMP and CSIS, when looking at that information—particularly CSIS—made an assessment that torture wasn't involved, and yet the person making that assessment had no experience in torture? How do we get past some of those things? Do you have any thoughts on it?