I can tell you there's progress.
I was joining you and others before we were in government—our group, not yours yet—in asking for this oversight. For years we asked for that and we didn't get it. In fairness, on the second Arar report, it's just been a matter of months. As I'm finding, the amount of consultation that has to happen just between departments alone in terms of establishing the reporting mechanisms that are going to be involved in oversight, consulting with other countries who have oversight committees, and I've been doing that extensively.... I'm telling you, as I said to our previous Liberal colleague, it's coming soon. You know we're not in the habit of making announcements before we can make announcements, but I'm going to have something for this committee to look at very soon. I don't want to prejudge how you will see it, but some of your input I think you'll recognize there. You and others have had good input there. So it's coming soon, but I don't want to pre-date here.
Once we were able to transfer the firearms registry to the RCMP, they've been able to apply some of their own methods of accuracy and data collection. As you know, the RCMP were the collectors of this data before, and you will see—and the commissioner may want to comment further, but I appreciate as long as I'm here that you want to have me comment on this—there have been improvements, I believe, related to the restricted registry. I think in fairness, though, that although the Auditor General did comment that accuracy in data is a problem across the board, the vast majority of that was with the long-gun registry. Having said that, the commissioner can comment further on improvements on the technical capability of assuring data on the other parts of the registry.