No, I'm just saying that the statute says under the exceptions—and you've already covered some of them—that under paragraph 11(3)(b) the exception is that the commissioner may disclose “if the protectee or former protectee has previously disclosed the information or acted in a manner that results in the disclosure”.
What I'm saying is, if you act in the community in a way that draws attention to yourself and such that I can recognize the man's face on the front page of a newspaper, I believe that this, if not the public interest, which you've already discussed, would be yet another method by which the commissioner should disclose at least what the person did, not necessarily who he is now.