My question has to do with the awarding of contracts.
In its review of the contracts from 1997 to 2005, the Office of the Auditor General found that some of them had been awarded in a non-competitive way, such as the contracts with an initial value of less than the $25,000 ceiling, which were increased considerably subsequently. There were also the many contracts for $24,000.
To what extent has the current management of the Firearms Centre improved its competitive procedures?