I hope they do. I don't know what the terms of reference are for many of the investigations or reviews currently under way, but I've also learned that when we get a few answers, it seems to open up the doors to a couple more questions.
The more we learn about this, the more we realize we have more to learn. In response to the member's question from earlier, we know a lot about the deaths—that's what I learned when I did my first research project; we know much about the deaths, but we know almost nothing about the people who survive.
Dr. Christine Hall has started the restraint study, which is in its infancy, but we hope her examination of people who survive may open some doors and answer some questions that we've been searching for in the past.
We're a long way, I think, from getting to the reason. I don't think we're going to find one mechanism. Dr. John Ratey at Harvard Medical School said one of the problems with science is that scientists are always looking for the one piece of the puzzle that answers all the questions. As I said to you in my comments, I found around eight different mechanisms, any one of which could cause the death in and of itself.
When you add three or four of these potential problems to the event, it's a wonder that people are surviving at all. And I'm not talking about the use of conducted energy weapons; I'm talking about the physiological stress that some people get themselves into, induced by either ingested substances or circumstances that are organic in nature. It's the way they were built and there's nothing they can do about it.