Thank you.
There may be no better way to handle this, and I'm uncertain. There's the idea of talking to the officials on Thursday, the minister on Tuesday, and then having all these witnesses come and raise issues that we then cannot go back to the minister and officials on. Or perhaps we can, and I'd like some clarification on that. It obviously seems to make more sense that those questions are raised and then we have a chance to ask those questions of the minister or of the ministerial staff. Would this be the normal procedure, that the ministerial staff and the minister would come at the end of the discussion?