Thank you.
I was very interested in your answer to a previous questioner about the fact that we don't state that you cannot use evidence that has been received when someone has been tortured. It is implicit, but we don't have to state it; it has been implicit. I have to say that I do find that a bit ironic, because I always thought it was somehow implicit that we returned to Canada our citizens who had been found guilty and were facing the death penalty in another country. That's not stated; while it was implicit, it no longer is, but that is an aside.
Mr. Minister, given that the U.K., on which this model is heavily based, has twice said there are problems with this system—most recently on October 14—I'm curious as to why we would still proceed with a system that is very much like theirs, when it has twice been criticized by their House of Lords.