I'll try to address those questions.
First of all, I mentioned the year 1991 in saying there had been 28 successful applications of the security certificate process. I didn't want to give the impression this process started in 1991; I believe it was 1977 when it first came in, so I should have mentioned that at the start.
If I'm not wrong, it was actually to do with organized crime. Some cases were identified internationally as being involved in organized crime in such a significant way that a process had to be developed. Those people were trying to come to Canada, and as it was widely known who they were and what they were doing, the Liberal government of the day said, I think quite rightly, that there had to be a process to stop that. Yes, they could appeal, but those people were so dangerous.... Maybe it was drug-related or assassination-related--who knows? In any case they were saying they were so dangerous that we were just going to have to find a way to detain them while they were here.
So when it came in, it was related to organized crime in the first instance, and that's an important part of your question. We're looking at this in a post-9/11 context, thinking about terrorism all the time, but in fact it applies to organized crime. In one case not that long ago, it was applied to an individual as a known espionage agent; the same process was put in place, so it's not talking strictly about terrorism.
Did I catch all parts of the question there? Was there something I missed? I wrote down the one on national security, and when it began....