It seems to me that there are two proceedings here. One is the judicial procedure and the other is the immigration procedure, and to me they seem not to be separated here. I personally think they should be. As far as policy on immigration is concerned, the determination should be in the hands of people to determine whether or not, by association....
At the previous meeting I gave an example of a person who may be under surveillance from their country of origin, and there was therefore a certainty that they were associated with organized crime in the country of origin but there was no proof. That person could come here, but there really isn't anything substantial to prove it. However, the information from the police or Interpol or whatever says that this person is likely associated with....
Do you want that type of person to be allowed to come to Canada?