The second point is to do with the introduction of section 115 of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act as a process that can happen in parallel to the security certificate process. Section 115 is not a process at all; it is the statement of the non-refoulement principle. It's an important statement, which incorporates into Canadian law our obligation not to send refugees back to face persecution.
Why have they included section 115 as a process that can happen in parallel to the security certificate process? It appears it's because they are using section 115 quite wrongly and perversely, from our perspective, as a way of essentially stripping someone of the refugee status they already have. We find that extremely problematic.