May I just go back to the intention that we had in coming before this committee?
The question was, is Bill C-3 an answer to the objections that the Supreme Court saw to the process? We say no. This is why we are here.
On December 4th, 2007. See this statement in context.
December 4th, 2007 / 4:35 p.m.
Lawyer, Ligue des droits et libertés
May I just go back to the intention that we had in coming before this committee?
The question was, is Bill C-3 an answer to the objections that the Supreme Court saw to the process? We say no. This is why we are here.
See context to find out what was said next.