Thank you very much.
Thank you to each of you for coming and sharing your knowledge with us.
We've had quite a few really good suggestions from different witnesses over the last couple of days on how to do amendments, but this is a bill that has come to us after second reading, and some of these amendments, in our procedural ways, would be outside the scope of the bill and probably would not be receivable for us to do and follow along those paths. So I'm going to focus on a couple of things that I'm hoping would be inside the bill, that we could do an amendment on.
I want to ask your opinion, first of all, on the confidentiality, the special advocate right now, what level of confidentiality we could insert into this legislation that would improve it from where it is today.
The other thing I'd like to talk about is whether a named person should have choice of counsel. Again, I think that's something that would be inside the scope of the bill, that maybe we would be able to usefully work on.
Thirdly, one of my real concerns on this is, as we've seen in other jurisdictions, the resources to special advocates. What types of things should the government be looking at in the work of a special advocate, if that's the movement that goes forward? What, in your opinion, would be necessary?
I don't care who starts with this, but I'd like to hear all of your opinions.
Thank you. I have only five minutes.