I think my answer would be that it has to be a process, and it's an ongoing one. The fact that a country has been identified as one by Amnesty International, or by the U.S. State Department, or by our own foreign affairs department, or even by us--and we do yearly assessments of each of our posts--that engages in practices we don't approve of would not necessarily mean that particular information that we get from them would be extracted by those means. That's the first point.
My short answer is that there is no finite list. Perhaps if I can put it another way, I know we are looking for a way in which we can say green light in all of these cases but red light in these kinds of cases. Frankly, my perhaps unsatisfactory answer to you or to some of the members here has to be that by and large our response is neither a red nor a green but in a lot of instances an orange light, which means proceed but proceed with caution.