I don't know if the council has made any submissions on that, so I'll leave that aside because I just don't know the answer to that. But I can tell you that the system isn't perfect. There are lots of things that we can improve on in the present tools that we have, both in terms of crime prevention and crime investigation.
One of the main criticisms, of course, for any kind of supervisory order, which is true for probation—and long-term-offender designations entail a type of probationary supervision—is that there aren't enough probation officers, and the rehabilitation side and treatment side of our criminal justice system is lacking in resources.
I guess that comes back to the point I made about how we decide where our money goes. Does it go to the rehabilitation side or does it go to the registry side? Can the two interact? Can the two work together? Can there be some way of coming to a middle ground so that the two regimes can work together? That may be.