We recognize that people convicted of offences have a reduced expectation of privacy. As it turned out yesterday, we appeared before the Senate to discuss the review of the DNA Identification Act. That's an example of another piece of legislation that's based on the assumption that people who have committed certain offences have a reduced expectation of privacy.
Having said that, we certainly don't believe that someone has no expectation of privacy, that it's completely eliminated as a result of offending. And the question we would ask you to consider is whether there is a clear benefit from this regime that justifies the reduction in the privacy of the individuals in question. We've heard a great deal of evidence about the effectiveness of it. The question you should ask is whether it's possible to make changes that would enhance the effectiveness to further justify that reduced privacy.