I'll probably have time for one last question here.
We had representation from the British Parliament on their oversight mechanism for national security. Are you familiar with that model? This is one whereby the Prime Minister appoints senior parliamentarians, people who really have no agenda to move through the political process, because as you can see from our interaction here, things become politicized very easily at this level. In a serious matter such as national security, I wish it weren't that way, frankly. I speak for myself here.
Having said that, the British model is one in which these parliamentarians operate in a fairly secretive environment. They get the very details of what has happened and have to be sworn to secrecy on a lot of these matters. They're hand-picked by the Prime Minister and report to the Prime Minister of Britain.
What do you think of that model?