Thank you.
Mr. Rondinelli, you mentioned the length of time it takes for processing. You also mentioned that DNA evidence has been instrumental in exonerating people who have been charged and convicted.
We also have to take into account, Mr. Rondinelli, that this compilation of data has been in Canada for roughly only nine years; therefore, any data, and any percentages or analysis thereof, would be premature. Because we now rely so heavily on fingerprint data, would you not agree that because DNA data is so definitive, it is as likely to remove a person or an accused person from the suspect list as it is to convict him or her; therefore, it would be a good tool in the interest of justice because the likelihood of convicting a person of a serious charge would be less likely? In other words, we wouldn't have as many wrongful convictions if we had sufficient data.