In the context that they are not powers for us to use. They would be used by the attorneys general or by the RCMP, so we would not use them. They would use intelligence that we would produce and decide whether or not it would be useful to use.
In a general sense, I think they're useful because it points out to people that if there's a real problem—and if I understand correctly, these powers were never used in the first five years—and if you can get a judge and an attorney general to agree, we can force someone to testify in a particular circumstance. It's a useful tool to have. But again, I want to repeat, from my limited perspective, that it's not a tool we would use; others would use it.