Yes. We found that they had made good progress in assessing the costs and including...
One of the problems in 2002 was that they were only reporting direct costs. A lot of the indirect costs weren't being included. They had changed that. As well, the allocation between the licensing and the registering activities had also improved.
So we were satisfied at that point. There were a couple of, I guess, more technical issues around year-end costs that we raised at the time, but generally we were satisfied with the progress that had been made.