Thank you very much, Chair, and thank you for being here today as well.
I just want to underline the point that we had a motion in front of us to have a meeting and to deal with that motion. Another item that should be cited here in the point of order I'm making is not just that we have the motion we're debating right now, but that there was a subsequent motion following that, which was given 48 hours' notice, which would naturally follow in sequence after this motion was dealt with. I'm referring to the motion that all members have, I think, in both official languages, that we would have a witness immediately after if we decided to conduct meetings on the G-8 and G-20. Ms. Nathalie Des Rosiers was here, and that motion was to follow this one.
In terms of sequence, I think there was the motion we had live on whether or not to have a meeting on the G-8 and G-20. Following that was the motion that was submitted by my colleague, with 48 hours' notice, to have a witness to follow up on our request for a meeting on the G-8 and G-20. So I respectfully submit to Mr. MacKenzie that it was fair enough if he read something into the record. I think he's done that, and if we can, let's move on now and actually vote on the motion in front of us.