Okay. I'll just conclude briefly on this.
Basically, on the fence, we are inviting a prioritization. The weaponry is the same, and I think for the entire legal structure....
I want to conclude with two things.
You have now the terms of reference that we're suggesting, which were designed with Amnesty International. We understand why the public may be reluctant to spend other money on the G-20. However, all the reviews that are taking place now are partial and they will not get at the interactions between CSIS, the RCMP, and what was going on. That's a crucial piece of information that is needed, both for the public and for the police to be able to present what indeed happened.
In our view, it will be cheaper not to wait for the two class actions to be resolved, but to proactively exercise leadership from the federal government to indeed recognize that something went wrong there and that it should be concluded.
I have one more point. I just want to say that you cannot have 1,000 people arrested and the message is that their government does not care.
I also speak to you as both men and women of political life. In our view of what happened, the freedom to peaceful assembly is as important as the right to vote. If we don't support it, if we don't support peaceful political engagement, I think we're losing a generation. I implore you to listen to them.
Thank you very much.
Thank you for your indulgence, Mr. Chairman.