As far as I'm concerned, it is quite clear that we don't need this bill. Since the legislation has not been in effect, conspiracies have been discovered, charges have been laid, and convictions have been secured. We don't need it. As I see it, the only time it could possibly be used would be where there is an attempt to lower the standard of evidence. Mr. Forcese talked about an imminent attack, or the risk of an imminent attack—the narrow “gap”, as he put it--
On December 13th, 2010. See this statement in context.