That could be interpreted as confirming the overall testimony we've heard to the effect that electronic monitoring is only successful when it's coupled closely with programs and with actual human contact. Then today we heard from the witnesses prior to your appearance that one of the things electronic monitoring does is document, as a more concrete way to measure whether someone is complying with a rule or a condition, which in turn would help them with the work they're doing with their program or with their parole officer.
Is that a conclusion that could be drawn?