Yes. Again, we're correcting an inconsistency in order to protect solicitor-client privilege. Information that is shared between an officer and his or her legal counsel in relation to a hearing must be deemed privileged.
The French should be read to understand that it's only information that is exchanged at a hearing that is privileged. Sorry, the French could be read that way, so we're moving this amendment to clarify that all information exchanged in relation to a hearing...it's just to clarify which information should have that protection. I guess the French is a little more ambiguous. That's what this amendment does.
(Amendment agreed to [See Minutes of Proceedings] )