I understand. You are assuming that the normal system will be able to operate and prosecution can be the end goal.
You mentioned conditions. I'm just wondering, is there any kind of a blurring here of the arrest for the crime of attempting or intending to leave the country, prosecuting for that, and securing recognizance with conditions for somebody who you believe is leaving the country for that purpose? Is the intent to use the recognizance provisions as a way to control their exit? The U.K. has control orders. You actually take passports away from people, etc. Is there some jibing of leaving the offence provisions and the recognisance with conditions provisions that you see as crucial to this piece?