Minister Nicholson, before the Senate, talked about both of these new reinvigorated provisions that have lapsed, investigative hearings and recognizance conditions, as potential sources of evidence to discern the intent of a person to leave the country. There was a serious focus of attention in the Senate about how you are going to prove this. Both of you will be at the operational end, or at least people down the system from you will be, of asking for investigative hearings or suggesting they're needed. The clear implication...I can't imagine that the minister is talking about using this as a way to be disruptive. He must be thinking about calling in people who have information about somebody else who may be leaving or is possibly suspected of leaving the country, gathering evidence to that, and then using that evidence as the way to prove they have the intent. It brings up a lot of concerns about what circle of people you would be bringing into an investigative hearing to search for that kind of evidence—family, community, neighbour.
I'm just wondering if you could address those comments, and the danger, especially since you are emphasizing that these shouldn't be used lightly.