One of the provisions within this piece of legislation is the recognizance with conditions. Ms. Beauregard, you might want to comment because of the work you do with terrorist assessment, and you as well, Mr. Yaworski.
Some of the individuals who are working aiding and abetting terrorist activity are not working directly with the terrorists. They may not necessarily even have knowledge of what the end result of their actions might be. I know it's going to assist with their cause, but whether it's purchasing something, raising money, or making connections, they may not even know exactly what the work they do or the actions they take might result in. Yet they are, for all intents and purposes, contributing to a terrorist activity.
Am I correct in that? If I am, would you be able to share with us why it's important to make sure these individuals can have conditions placed on them to stop activity which to all of us would not necessarily be an illegal activity? Whether it's being on the Internet, placing a call, or raising money for a cause, it's not their specific actions that need to be stopped; it's because of the result their actions will have.