Thank you.
The investigative hearing provisions, which I don't have in front of me, are triggered by a peace officer making the application for the investigative hearing. When Mr. Fadden refers to the need for protocols, which makes sense as there will be a need, do you see some kind of a requirement for consultation between the peace officers who can trigger the investigative hearing and intelligence agencies like CSIS?
I can just imagine any number of ways in which an investigative hearing could mess up an intelligence operation or budding operation. Do you foresee that a peace officer, in the context of many of these kinds of terrorist offenders leaving the country, will be required to check with intelligence before making that request for an investigative hearing?