I'm looking at my notes here.
This one and the next one coming up are simply amendments on the offences that deal with harbouring, where the current language refers to the likelihood that somebody will carry out a terrorist act. Our view, bolstered by some of the testimony and submissions from, for example, the Canadian Bar Association, is that there is far too lax a standard of mens rea in this context, and that it would be much more in keeping with our traditions and would avoid some of the dangers of an overly lax standard to replace that with “intends to”. That's why this is here.