Mr. Chair, I won't spend too much time on this, because I worked it into the earlier explanation, and Ms. Findlay has also replied.
I would simply say that the importance of the Senate from the government's perspective and the possibility that it could only be a Senate committee that would do the review are clear from the text and from Ms. Findlay's counterpoint. I would simply like to reiterate that the NDP, the official opposition, very much sees that as a problem and would like to retain the wording that is suggested here:
[That the committee must be] of the House of Commons or of both Houses...that may be designated by the House of Commons
So when it says, “both Houses”, that would mean a joint committee.