I think this amendment is self-explanatory. It falls under the category of I think two of the earlier amendments—namely, making more express and explicit that which we might think would more or less obviously be covered in a review process.
Because of the stakes, because of the concerns about the extraordinary nature of investigative hearings and recognizance without conditions, we think it's just better to be clear about the kinds of information that would be minimally needed in a report. We're just setting out some of that in this provision.