I understand the points being made. I think I can go along with them to a certain point, but I think it is important to remember that proving intent throughout the criminal law in general can also make use of physical activity and all kinds of other signs. You don't have to prove intent by literally getting inside somebody's head, whether you're the first person or the third person.
We actually believe that some of the same evidence that Ms. Findlay is talking about, which you would want to have in, would still be available, but you would still have to show an intentional state of mind and not simply likelihood. That's all.