I have no problem with that, but I would prefer that the comments made be relevant to the decision that the quasi-judicial board is considering at that time. As you've heard from many of the victims who have appeared before you, it's very difficult not to go back to the original offence and want to continue to hold inmates accountable for that initial deed. But information such as whether they've issued threats is all relevant and I think it should be part of an accepted statement.
On February 25th, 2014. See this statement in context.