The criteria are pretty clear here, but I might tell you that I want to know the weight of these criteria.
What if the police force, the municipality, the provincial government, etc., and all of the health care authorities decide this is a good thing to do, given the status of safe injections and disease at that time in that particular area and place, and the community says no? How would that weigh? I need to know that this is not going to be weighted in a manner.... The name of this bill is community safety. It shouldn't be, I would like to suggest, because it isn't about community safety only. It is about the safety of persons, and that includes addicts and patients. I don't hear that anywhere here. It's just the safety of a community alone.
The community does not understand, in many ways, what the objective issues are. Will you weigh it only...? If the community were to say no, would that preclude putting down an InSite? None of this is very clear. The weight falls on the minister's shoulders. I did not hear either minister say a single word about the rights of the persons addicted and their right to life, liberty, and security of their person. It was about all of the other things. I need to know how that weighting is going to go.