In response to the question regarding the two years, unfortunately with these safe injection sites, there's enormous public scrutiny, probably far too much. In some ways, you just need to let the operation get on with its business and do a good job. I do think if other applications were approved, or even for InSite itself, there is that public scrutiny.
But this amendment here is about the bill itself and the impact of the bill and how it has been implemented. I think that's a slight difference. It's really about the bill. The bill is being sunsetted. It's about the process of how this bill is being used and the discretion of the minister, so it's a slightly different matter.