Thank you, that's great.
I did want to return to the Wakeling case that just came down roughly a week ago from the Supreme Court. You indicated that, from the combined majority holding, already this law is going to need at least an amendment with respect to much clearer legal provisions on some of the aspects of what the warrant might authorize, including sharing of the information that might be produced by the activities authorized by the warrant. That's clear from the majority reasoning. So this bill already needs an amendment based on the Supreme Court case.
The dissent agrees with that but they went a bit further. I want to read a passage and ask whether you think this as a policy matter is something we as Parliament should take seriously:
However, when information is shared across jurisdictional lines, safeguards apply and domestic investigations lose their force.—