Professor Tepper, the National Post editorial talked about concerns that it had, and I think those concerns were derived from speaking behind the scenes to security officials. The worry was that Internet chatter would begin to dry up on the basis of this new provision. Monitoring Internet chatter allows agencies to detect where there might be real threats and where efforts might be well invested in order to reach out and prevent threats by using, hopefully, the best and most effective measures.
Would you have any concerns along those lines if in fact it proved to be an evidentiary matter that the Internet chatter scene would begin to go silent and would have a counterproductive, almost blowback effect on the bill? Would you be concerned if that turned out to be true?