I think we're talking about the ability to access information, share information, disclose information, if I'm correct, and the aspect in regard to information sharing.
I mentioned in my opening comments about the new approach that police across Canada are taking in regard to community safety and well-being and the situational table or the hub table. The purpose of that table is so that we can share information about individuals in our communities, and I mean the collective communities, or it could be an individualized community, but that information is shared. Much of that information is currently held within the containers of health, education, social services, and other government containers of information. When they come together and they share that information, as I called it, it's the early-warning opportunity where we can jointly identify an acutely elevated individual, so more than one party at the table has a concern that this individual is showing anti-social behaviour, in this case leading down the pathway towards radicalization.
We can share that information in private, with privacy concerns. It's a construct that has a process to it in which the groups that are involved with the individual alone share that information and not groups that are outside of the acutely elevated individual and their anti-social behaviour. The fact is, it's information that's shared with the right to privacy. It's information that's shared with respect to the individual, but also allows the organizations to intervene and provide opportunities or alternative solutions to that individual so that we can curb anti-social behaviour and in this case hopefully provide the off-ramp from the pathway to radicalization.