I think there's an unintended consequence here of this amendment. As I read the amendment, it would remove the obligation of the minister to respond to an individual within 90 days. This means that if the minister doesn't respond to the individual, then the individual can't go to court and try to get himself removed from the list. Surely we wouldn't want to put an individual in limbo like that. I don't think this is a well-thought-out amendment.
Maybe we should ask the officials if that's a correct interpretation.