Thank you very much, Mr. Chair.
In this case I agree 100% with Mr. Norlock. There are two aspects here. One is preserving the discretion of the judge who will have the full information in front of him, and the other is the features that Mr. Norlock named, that while an appeal goes through the process and the original reason for listing someone may have been unreasonable, additional information may be available to the judge. So I think it's important that we preserve that discretion for the judge who will have the most recent and full information.