I think the larger airline said they welcomed the changes in the bill. They had specific concerns about that one clause, that one section that we've already amended, that the government put forward the amendment on.
I am wondering if the officials could answer a question for me with regard to the current process for the passenger protect system for individuals who are an imminent threat to the aircraft itself. How does that work currently with the smaller airports, such as the one of the representative from this organization? I am trying to figure out whether the passenger protect system applies to those types of locations as well, just to get more insight on this.