I am comfortable with that. Again, I want to take a look at it more, because this is actually replacing what is currently there. What is currently there refers to the screening of a person before they enter an area—unless I'm in completely the wrong spot, but I think I'm in the right spot—and this is actually the requirement to “alert” of the screening of a person. I don't know whether both would still be required, as distinct from having one replace the other.
Again, I would be very happy, if we can defer this so that I have time to take a look at it, obviously with my colleagues on the committee on this side as well as with the background on this particular amendment.