I would oppose that amendment. Even though the change in wording narrows the scope, it broadens the activity around terrorism that would no longer constitute a violation. The effect would be to create an offence of advocacy or promotion of terrorism in general, which would have a greater intent requirement than that needed to convict a person for counselling the commission of a crime committed under section 464 of the Criminal Code, so I would not support it.
On March 31st, 2015. See this statement in context.