Mr. Chair, I have a commitment at one o'clock.
In any event my question really is for the officials on this. How does this proposed addition compare with the travel protect program that is already in place? I think there needs to be conformity in the law between the two programs. I understand what Randall is proposing here. I think it's to put a safeguard in place on when the minister may direct an air carrier. Does this amendment in your estimation complicate that in any way, or is there a difference between the no-fly list here and the travel protect system that's already in place?