Evidence of meeting #100 for Public Safety and National Security in the 42nd Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was scan.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Warren Coons  Director General, Preventive Security and Intelligence, Correctional Service of Canada
Johny Prasad  Director, Program Compliance and Outreach, Programs Branch, Canada Border Services Agency
Rob Campney  Deputy Director, Preventive Security and Intelligence, Correctional Service of Canada
Phil Lightfoot  Acting Director General, Science and Engineering Directorate, Information, Science and Technology Branch, Canada Border Services Agency

March 20th, 2018 / 12:40 p.m.

Deputy Director, Preventive Security and Intelligence, Correctional Service of Canada

Rob Campney

In terms of corrections, the visitor proceeds with the next phase of entering the institution.

12:40 p.m.

Liberal

Julie Dabrusin Liberal Toronto—Danforth, ON

There are no further questions, nothing, right? Unless there's something else, based on the ion scanner, there are no further—

12:40 p.m.

Deputy Director, Preventive Security and Intelligence, Correctional Service of Canada

Rob Campney

Based on the scan, the ion scan has given the visitor a pass and they proceed.

12:40 p.m.

Liberal

Julie Dabrusin Liberal Toronto—Danforth, ON

If I understand, ion scanner use started in the nineties. Is that correct? I thought it was in 1995. I'm actually talking about for corrections. When did you start using them?

12:40 p.m.

Supt Warren Coons

In the early 2000s.

12:40 p.m.

Liberal

Julie Dabrusin Liberal Toronto—Danforth, ON

Do you have an actual year?

12:40 p.m.

Supt Warren Coons

No, but we can get that for you, Mr. Chair.

12:40 p.m.

Liberal

Julie Dabrusin Liberal Toronto—Danforth, ON

Do you have any statistics as to contraband drugs inside the prison in the year before and in the year after you started using it? You must have numbers.

You indicated no, so I'll just put that on the record.

12:40 p.m.

Supt Warren Coons

That's correct. We don't have those statistics here.

12:40 p.m.

Liberal

Julie Dabrusin Liberal Toronto—Danforth, ON

Not here? That's fine.

12:40 p.m.

Supt Warren Coons

Frankly, I don't know whether those statistics exist.

12:40 p.m.

Liberal

Julie Dabrusin Liberal Toronto—Danforth, ON

Do you keep track of contraband drug use in your institutions? In any given year, do you track this?

12:40 p.m.

Supt Warren Coons

You're talking about a very broad question when you talk about drug use in an institution. There are various indicators, such as seizures, but we also have other factors. We know through intelligence, for instance, that there may be drugs in the institutions but we haven't seized any. It's a very nebulous kind of question when we talk about drug use within the institution. How you measure that is a very difficult challenge.

12:40 p.m.

Liberal

Julie Dabrusin Liberal Toronto—Danforth, ON

That's fair enough. It's just that the report we've been looking at referred to the rate of random urinalysis drug testing results remaining stable over the past five years.

12:40 p.m.

Supt Warren Coons

We do have urinalysis statistics; that's correct.

12:40 p.m.

Liberal

Julie Dabrusin Liberal Toronto—Danforth, ON

That was one marker used there.

12:40 p.m.

Supt Warren Coons

That's an example, yes.

12:40 p.m.

Liberal

Julie Dabrusin Liberal Toronto—Danforth, ON

I'm just trying to bring it back because there's been all this discussion about.... Obviously we're looking at whether this is a useful piece to keep in place, the ion scanner, and whether it actually helps to keep drugs out. Are there any markers other than urinalysis that you can track from the year before you used the ion scanners and the year after?

12:40 p.m.

Supt Warren Coons

I'm not aware of those statistics, but I can tell you that things like detector dog indications, things like ion scan positive hits, things like intelligence that we have within our institution can all be indicative without actually having evidence of drugs within the institution.

It's going to be very difficult, other than those clear indicators such as urinalysis pass/fail. That's clear. Seizures are not necessarily indicative of the amount of drugs in an institution in a given year. If seizures have increased year over year, whether or not there are more drugs, there is not necessarily a correlation there because there could be—

12:40 p.m.

Liberal

Julie Dabrusin Liberal Toronto—Danforth, ON

I'm going to jump in because I'm running out of time.

Can you provide to us—you're not going to have it with you now—the urinalysis results from the year before you used the ion scanner and the year after you started using the ion scanner?

12:40 p.m.

Supt Warren Coons

I will commit that if there are those statistics available, in other words, if the timing of when we started the urinalysis program means the statistics are available, we will definitely make those available to the committee, Mr. Chair.

12:40 p.m.

Liberal

Julie Dabrusin Liberal Toronto—Danforth, ON

If that isn't available and there is any other data indicator, I would appreciate that data.

You're asking us to make recommendations based on whether this ion scanner is something that should remain as part of your detection, so any data you can help us with to show that it has had any type of positive impact on the level of contraband drugs in your institutions would be helpful.

12:40 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal John McKay

Thank you, Ms. Dabrusin.

I see no other members wishing to ask questions. Before I thank our witnesses, I want to make sure that members are satisfied that we have clarity with respect to undertakings. There does seem to be a kind of thread of contradiction between the corrections office and what's being said here. I'm going to work on the assumption that we do have clarity of undertakings, and possibly we may see you again.

Regardless, I want to thank you for the testimony and thank you for your help in our study. You are free to go.

I want to speak to the committee. As you can see in our agenda, we have the member Alain Rayes here on Tuesday morning to talk about M-124. We had anticipated having witnesses on the Thursday for M-124. If anybody has witnesses they want the clerk to call, sooner would be better than later so that we can fill the Thursday witness list.

Mr. MacKenzie.

12:45 p.m.

Conservative

Dave MacKenzie Conservative Oxford, ON

As I was at a previous committee, my only caution is that the Thursday of Good Friday week may be a Friday.

12:45 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal John McKay

You have rare insight, Mr. MacKenzie.