I would ask the officials if they could weigh in on this. I have a couple of questions.
What would be the value of adding this type of information to a report? That's one. Second, will this specific information, if added to the report, be relevant down the road in the future? Third, is it possible that foreign threats could use the kind of specific information this amendment is speaking about to better attack Canada down the road? Is that a good enough reason, or a justification, to block it or to oppose the amendment?