As I said earlier, I believe there's a model there. I fully respect that there are budgets, and government only has so much money and so on. One of my proposals was for a model, if you will. Again, instead of $631 across the board, for the sake of argument, it would be zero for one group and it might be $900 for another group, depending on ability to pay.
The bottom line is that the cost is a barrier to so many people. You asked why the government should pay. I don't have the economic proof in front of me, but there's absolutely no doubt in my mind that for $631 or $150, or whatever that number is, to pay that small amount on behalf of somebody who is trying to make their life better, and to have them get off the system....
We all know the cost to the system of people who need a hand. I don't think it's even close. I think there's a multiplier there of 10 times.