You mentioned the internal CSC aspect of it, that it looks as if the consultation was just done in-house.
On page 40 of your annual report, you make a note that the case summary from the Saskatchewan riot varies significantly from the national board investigation of that exact same incident. It's a summarization. It seems odd to me that the national board investigation report is going to vary from Correctional Service Canada's report. It just seem odd. Does that concern you?
I have a couple of things. It's concerning to me to read what you say.
My questions are as follows. Given your knowledge of what goes on, as the investigator, who would authorize the summary of a report to be different from the actual report? That's one.
On this suggestion from you that maybe the credibility of CSC is now called into question, does that, then, give rise to...? You just said that the devil is in the detail of the legislation. We're supposed to blindly pass a bill that has so much left to regulations that we don't know what we're going to get.