I agree. I think you already had a presentation on a single event with two people in a car accident responding very differently to the accident and then eventually developing very different types of post-traumatic stress disorder. That talks about the individual differences.
I think the call for action is to understand that we need to be much more integrative and bring out all the evidence and information and not silo them, because we don't have enough resources to do that. I think the sooner we can come together on all different facets, with the expertise we need to solve those problems, the better it's going to be. That single exposure to the accident, with two individuals responding differently, tells you a lot about the complexity of the illness. It's not just the event; the response of the two individuals to the event was very different. Then you have to ask if this is related to the individual differences in the two people, or if it is really a gender thing? It opens up much broader questions. I think it's important to integrate.
The point you're trying to bring is that instead of addressing issues that are specific to individual groups, if we address the fundamental issue, which is individual differences, I think we'll make much more progress.